
تعداد نشریات | 20 |
تعداد شمارهها | 526 |
تعداد مقالات | 4,561 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 9,713,559 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,456,002 |
Critical Analysis of Purism and Establishmentism Views in Indigenous Science | ||
Islamic Political Thought | ||
دوره 11، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 22، شهریور 2024، صفحه 101-118 اصل مقاله (310.34 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Article (Political Thought) | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30497/ipt.2024.77753 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Sayyed Yasem Gourabi* 1؛ Hamid Nassaj2 | ||
1Assistant Professor, Faculty of Political Science, Payam Noor University of Hamedan, Hamedan, Iran | ||
2Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Two important methods are presented for the phenomenon of religious science. One is the establishment of new religious science, and the other is the modification, reconstruction, and completion of the existing sciences. This research seeks to critique the first point of view and prepare the ground for a second view. In this way, the main circles of establishment views (New- Akhbari, Qom Academy of Sciences, and Fardid Circle) have briefly proposed and criticized. The focuses of criticism are based on historical induction, impossibility, undesirableness, the tradition of the Prophet and imams, and the emotionality of the establishment-oriented reaction. The final solution presented in this article is purposeful and intelligent adaptation. The first step for the phenomenon of indigenous science is the indigenous theory, and the first step for the phenomenon of indigenous theory is comparative studies. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
indigenous science؛ Islamic science؛ Islamic humanities؛ establishmentism | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 0 |