اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 476 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,070 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,289,294 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,343,041 |
شناسایی و تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر چسبندگی روابط درون شبکه‌های کسب‌وکار | ||
| اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی (اندیشه مدیریت) | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 14، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 28، مهر 1399، صفحه 615-642 اصل مقاله (1.05 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی-پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30497/smt.2021.240950.3241 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی پریشانی1؛ بهمن حاجی‌پور* 2؛ غلامحسین خورشیدی3؛ سید محمود حسینی4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار، مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3استاد، مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 4دانشیار، مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف این پژوهش ارائه‌ی چارچوبی نظری برای عوامل چسبندگی روابط درون شبکه‌های کسب‌وکار و همین‌طور نقش این عوامل در مراحل شکل‌گیری تا خاتمه یک رابطه درون بستر شبکه است. نوع پژوهش از منظر هدف، کاربردی و از منظر روش کتابخانه‌ای است. ابتدا مفهوم چسبندگی از 5 رویکرد دانشی مورد بررسی و مقایسه قرار گرفته است که عبارت‌اند از: رویکرد اسلامی، رویکرد اقتصادی، رویکرد روان‌شناختی، رویکرد جامعه‌شناختی و رویکرد علوم پایه؛ سپس رویکرد مورد استفاده در این مطالعه تشریح شده است. روش مورد استفاده پژوهش، مرور نظام‌مند بوده است که تعداد 56 مقاله مربوط به روابط درون شبکه‌های کسب‌وکار از 1971 تا 2021 میلادی در پایگاه‌های علمی استخراج شده است. پس از انجام فرآیند فیلترینگ و با استفاده از روش کدگذاری دستی، این 55 مقاله به‌صورت مطالعه تمام متن کدگذاری شده‌اند. عوامل تأثیرگذار روی چسبندگی روابط درون شبکه به 12 دسته کلی تقسیم شد که در سه لایه با نام‌های چسبندگی ساختاری، چسبندگی ادراکی و چسبندگی اختصاصی جای داده شده‌اند. از بین عوامل شناسایی‌شده، تعداد روابط ورودی و خروجی دارای بیشترین فراوانی بوده و لایه مربوط به چسبندگی ساختاری پرتکرارترین لایه است. در مرحله بعدی نیز چرخه عمر یک رابطه در بستر شبکه کسب‌وکار، ترسیم شده و اولویت سه لایه از چسبندگی برای آنها تعریف شده است. نتایج نشان از بیشترین تأثیر چسبندگی ساختاری در تمام مراحل چرخه عمر است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| چسبندگی؛ روابط کسب‌وکاری؛ شبکه‌های کسب‌وکار؛ مرور نظام‌مند | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identify and Explan of the Factors Affecting the Adhesion of Relationships within Business Networks | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Parishani1؛ Bahman Hajipour2؛ Gholam Hossein Khorshidi3؛ Seyyed Mahmoud Hosseini4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student in Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Associate Professor of Business Mnagement, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shhid Beheshti University, Tehrn, Iran | ||
| 3Professor, Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Associate Professor, Business Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this study is to provide a theoretical framework for the factors of adhesion in relationships within business networks and also an explanation of the role of these factors in the stages of formation of a relationship within the network. The type of research is applied in terms of purpose and library-based in terms of method. First, the concept of adhesion has been studied and compared according to five knowledge approaches, namely Islamic approach, economical approach, psychological approach, sociological approach and basic science approach. The approach used in this study is then described. The research method has been a systematic review of 55 articles related to relationships within business networks from 1971 to 2021 extracted from scientific databases. After conducting the filtering process and using the manual coding method, these 55 articles have been coded as a full text study. Factors affecting the adhesion of relationships within the network were divided into 12 general categories, placed in three layers named structural adhesion, perceptual adhesion and specific adhesion. Among the identified factors, the number of incoming and outgoing relationships has the highest frequency and the layer related to structural adhesion is the most frequent layer. In the next step, the life cycle of a relationship in the context of the business network is plotted and the priority of three layers of adhesion is defined for them. The results show the greatest effect of structural adhesion in all stages of the life cycle. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Adhesion, Business Relationships, Business Networks, Systematic Review | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adam, Ahmat (2020). Isalm and Javanese society: some religious considerations in pre-20th century java, Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History. Politics & Strategic Studies.11 (3). 112-136
Ahola, Tuomas; Aaltonen, Kirsi; Artto, Karlos & Lehtinen, Jere (2020). Making room to manoeuvre: How firms increase their influence with others in business networks, Industrial Marketing Management. In press.
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly. 45 (3). 425-455.
Akçayır, M. & Akçayır, G (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review. 20 (3). 1-11. Anderson, J., Håkansson, H. & Johanson, J. (1994). ‘Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context’, Journal of Marketing, 58(October): 10 Vol. 58 (4). 1–15.
Baraldi, E., Gressetvold, E., & Harrison, D. (2012). Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda. Journal of Business Research. 65 (2). 266 –276.
Bartlett, C. & Ghoshal, S. (1989). ‘Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution’, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Bonner, J.M., Kim, D. & Cavusgil, S.T., (2005). ‘Self-perceived strategic network identity and its effcts on market performance in alliance relationships’. Journal of Business Research. 58 (10). 1371–1380.
Cao, Shan; Wang, Jiadao; Li, Dangguo & Chen, Darong (2013). Ecological and social modeling for migration and adhesion pattern of a benthic diatom. Ecological modelling. 2 (250). 269-278.
Chalu, H.; Juma, H. & Thomas, H (2021). Business networks, regulation and local content in Tanzania's oil and gas sector. The extractive Industries and societies, In press.
Ciccarone, Giuseppe; Giuli, Francesco & Marchetti, Enrico (2019). Macroeconomic equilibrium and nominal price rigidities under imperfect rationality. Journal of Macroeconomics. 60 (16). 60-78.
Cooper, H. (2009). Research Synthesis and Meta- Analysis A Step-by-Step Approach. Sage Publications. Inc. Cottineau, Clementine & Arcaute, Elsa (2020). The Nested Structure of Urban Business clusters. Pllied Network Science. 5 (1). 131-157.
Cracco, Emiel & Brass, Marcel (2018) The role of sensorimotor processes in social group contagion. Cognitive Psychology.103 (6). 23-41.
Dicken, P (2003). Global shift: Reshaping the global economic map in the 21st century. Sage.
Eckenhofer, E.M. (2011). ‘Network management as a way to manage intellectual capital’, in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge Management – ECKM 2011, University of Passau, Passau. Einarsdottir, Thorgerdur; Rafnsdottir, Gudbjorg Linda; Sigrun Sigurdardottir, Margret & Thor Torfason, Magnus (2019). Networks, homogeneity and gender in Icelandic business elites. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 36 (1). 1-12
Ekici, Ahmet & Ekici, Şule Önsel (2019). Understanding and managing complexity through Bayesian network approach: The case of bribery in business transactions. Journal of Business Research. 131 (7). 321-340.
Ford, D; Gadde, L; Håkansson, H; Lundgren, A; Snehota, I; Thurnbull, P. & Wilson, D. (1998). Managing Business Relationships, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Gelderman, Cees J; Semeijn, Janjaap & Verhappen, Mark (2020). Buyer opportunism in strategic supplier relationships: Triggers, manifestations and consequences. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management.26 (2). 40-52
Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. (1990). The multinational corporation as an inter-organizational network. Academy of Management Review. 15 (4). 603–625.
Guercini, S. & Medlin, C (2020). A radical constructivist approach to boundaries in business network research. Industrial Marketing Management. In press.
Håkansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research. 55 (2) 133–139.
Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1989). No business is an island. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 5 (3). 187–200.
Snehota, I. (1995). Developing Relationships in Business Network, Routledge publication.
Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing. 18 (2). 165 –187.
Huang, Jyun-Wei & Lin, Chieh-Peng (2011). To stick or not to stick: The social response theory in the development of continuance intention from organizational cross-level perspective. Computers in Human Behavior. 27 (5). 1963-1973.
Jindo, Takashi; Kai, Yuko, Kitano, Naruki, Tsunoda, Kenji; Nagamatsu, Toshiya & Takashi, Arao (2020). Relationship of workplace exercise with work engagement and psychological distress in employees: A cross-sectional study from the MYLS study. Preventive Medicine Reports. Volume 17.
Jones, M. V., Coviello, N., & Tang, Y. K. (2011). International entrepreneurship research (1989 –2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing. 26 (6). 632 –659.
Knoke, D. & Kuklinski, J. (1982). Network Analysis, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Ko, Jason M & Lobo, Daniel (2019). Continuous Dynamic Modeling of Regulated Cell Adhesion: Sorting, Intercalation, and Involution, Biophysical Journal, 117 (11). 2166-2179.
Kurt, Yusuf; Sinkovics, Noemi; R. Sinkovics, Rudolf & Yamin, Mo (2020). The role of spirituality in Islamic business networks: The case of internationalizing Turkish SMEs. Journal of World Business. 55 (1). 135-50.
Madzimure, Jeremiah (2019) The influence of strategic networks and logistics integration on firm performance among small and medium enterprises. The Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management. 11 (1). 1-7.
Međedović, Janko & Kovačević, Uroš (2020). Personality as a state-dependent behavior: Do childhood poverty and pregnancy planning moderate the link between personality and fitness? Personality and Individual Differences. 154 (1). 124-151.
Michel, S., Saucède, F., Pardo, C., & Fenneteau, H. (2018). Business interaction and institutional work: When intermediaries make efforts to change their position. Industrial Marketing Management. 80 (2018). 266–279.
Moller, K. Nenonen, S. & Storbavka, K (2020). Networks, ecosystems, fields, market systems? Making sense of the business environment. Industrial Marketing Management. 90 (1). 380-399.
Möller, K., & Halinen, A. (2018). IMP thinking and IMM: Co-creating value for business marketing. Industrial Marketing Management. 69. 18–31.
Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Academic networks in a trichotomies categorization of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing. 18 (3). 333-359.
Pabayo, Roman; Grinshteyn, Erin, Avila, Oliva; Azrael, Deborah & Molnar, Beth E (2020). Relation between neighborhood socio-economic characteristics and social cohesion, social control, and collective efficacy: Findings from the Boston Neighborhood Study. SSM - Population Health. 10. 1-8
Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo & Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan (2021). Innovative strategic relationships among sustainable start-ups. Industrial Marketing Management. In Press.
Ruiz-Palomino, Pablo & Bañón-Gomis, Alexis (2017). The negative impact of chameleon-inducing personalities on employees' ethical work intentions: The mediating role of Machiavellianism. European Management Journal. 35 (1). 102-115.
Sakka, Georgia & Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal (2020). Unpacking the relationship between employee brand ambassadorship and employee social media usage through employee wellbeing in workplace: A theoretical contribution. Journal of Business Research. 119 (14). 354-363.
Seggie, Steven H & Griffith, David A (2021). The moderating effects of economic and strategic relationship value in tolerating active and passive opportunism. Journal of Business Research. 128 (31). 233-244.
Semrau, T., & Werner, A. (2014). How exactly do network relationships pay off? The effects of network size and relationship quality on access to start-up resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 38 (3). 501-525.
Tan, J., Zhang, H., & Wang, L. (2015). Network closure or structural hole? The conditioning effects of network-level social capital on innovation performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 39 (5). 1189 -1212.
Thorgren, S., Wincent, J., & Örtqvist, D. (2012). Unleashing synergies in strategic networks of SMEs: The influence of partner fit on corporate entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal. 30 (5). 453-471
Tiwana, A. (2008). Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal. 29 (4). 251-272.
Todeva, Emanuella (2009). Business networks, Strategy and Structure. First edition. Routledge publication.
Van Buren, Harry J; Greenwood, Michelle & Sheehan, Cathy (2011). Strategic human resource management and the decline of employee focus. Human Resource Management Review. 21 (3). 209-219.
Wang, C., Chung, L. & Henry, F (2020). Business networking and innovation of Asian enterprises in Western countries: The moderation of institutional distance. Journal of industrial Marketing Management. 88 (2). 152-162.
Wang, M. C., Chen, P. C., & Fang, S. C. (2018). A critical view of knowledge networks and innovation performance: The mediation role of firms' knowledge integration capability. Journal of Business Research. 88 (2019) 222-233.
Wu, jie & Ang, Siah Hwee (2020). Network complementaries in the international expansion of emerging market firms. journal of world business. 55. 32-43.
Zhang, Man, Hartley, Janet L & AL-Husan, Faten Baddar (2021). Informal interorganizational business relationships and customer loyalty: Comparing Guanxi, Yongo, and Wasta. International Business Review. 30 (3). 141-154
Zimmermann, Markus; Schopf, David; Lütteken, Niklas; Liu, Zhengzhenni; Storost, Konrad; Baumann, Martin, Happee, Riender, J. & Bengler, Klaus (2018). Carrot and stick: A game-theoretic approach to motivate cooperative driving through social interaction. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 88 (9). 159-175. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 474 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 129 |
||