اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 493 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,239 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,633,458 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,590,238 |
تبیین نقش سوگیری‌های شناختی بر بهره‌برداری از فرصت‌های کسب و کار با میانجی‌گری ادراک از ریسک (مورد مطالعه: بانوان کارآفرین استان لرستان) | ||
| اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی (اندیشه مدیریت) | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 16، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 34، دی 1401، صفحه 167-202 اصل مقاله (775.79 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی-پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30497/smt.2023.244404.3457 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رضا کهن هوش نژاد* 1؛ شیوا تیربازاری2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه(س)، قم، ایران | ||
| 2دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه حضرت معصومه (س)، قم، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با توجه به نقش‌آفرینی قلمرو شناخت کارآفرینانه در برانگیختن کارآفرینان بالقوه به بروز رفتار و اقدام‌های کارآفرینانه در شرایط عدم قطعیت محیطی که یکی از دلایل اصلی آن ادراک از ریسک کمتر کارآفرینان می‌باشد، اغلب مطالعات این حوزه بر کارآفرینان مرد صورت پذیرفته و درک محققان از بهکارگیری سوگیری‌های شناختی توسط بانوان کارآفرین محدود باقی مانده است. بهعلاوه نقش سوگیری‌های شناختی بر بهره‌برداری از فرصت‌ها بهعنوان یکی از فازهای کلیدی فرآیند کارآفرینانه مورد غفلت واقع شده است. بنابراین هدف این پژوهش تبیین نقش سوگیری‌های شناختی بانوان کارآفرین بر بهره‌برداری از فرصت‌های کسبوکار با میانجی‌گری ادراک از ریسک می‌باشد. این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از لحاظ روش توصیفی- همبستگی است. داده‌های این پژوهش از نمونه‌ای 184 نفری از بانوان کارآفرین استان لرستان، که به شیوۀ تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدند، گردآوری و با روش مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری با نرم‌افزار پی‌ال‌اس آزمون شد. روابط میانجی مدل نیز توسط آزمون سوبل بررسی شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد سوگیری‌های شناختی بانوان کارآفرین شامل اطمینان بیش از حد، توهم کنترل، نمایندگی، مغالطۀ برنامه‌ریزی و خوش‌بینی بر بهره‌برداری آنها از فرصت‌های کسب و کار تأثیر مستقیم و مثبت دارد و همچنین سوگیری‌های شناختی مذکور از طریق متغیر میانجی ادراک از ریسک بهطور غیرمستقیم بر بهره‌برداری بانوان کارآفرین از فرصت‌های کسب و کار تأثیر مثبت می‌گذارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ادراک از ریسک؛ بهره‌برداری از فرصت؛ سوگیری‌های شناختی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Explaining the role of cognitive biases on the exploitation of business opportunities with the mediation of risk perception (The Case of: female entrepreneurs of Lorestan province) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| reza Kohanhooshnejad1؛ shiva tirbazari2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management , Faculty of Humanities, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran | ||
| 2MSc, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Humanities, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The field of entrepreneurial cognition plays an important role in motivating potential entrepreneurs to take entrepreneurial behavior and actions in the conditions of environmental uncertainty, one of the main reasons of which is the perception of less risk by entrepreneurs. Most of the studies in this field have been conducted on male entrepreneurs and the researchers' understanding of the use of cognitive biases by women entrepreneurs remains limited. In addition, the role of cognitive biases on exploiting opportunities as one of the key phases of the entrepreneurial process has been neglected. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to explain the role of cognitive biases of female entrepreneurs in Lorestan province on the exploitation of business opportunities with the mediation of risk perception. This research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-correlation in terms of method. The data of this research were collected from a sample of 184 women entrepreneurs of Lorestan province, who were selected by stratified random method, and tested by structural equation modeling method with PLS software. The findings of the research showed that the cognitive biases of female entrepreneurs, including overconfidence, illusion of control, representiveness, fallacy of planning and optimism, have a direct and positive effect on their exploitation of business opportunities. In addition, the mentioned cognitive biases through the mediating variable of risk perception indirectly has a positive effect on the exploitation of business opportunities by women entrepreneurs. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Risk perception, Opportunity, Exploitation, cognitive biases, entrepreneurial cognition | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
آذر، عادل و غلام‌زاده، رسول (1398). مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری: کمترین مربعات جزئی. تهران: نگاه دانش.
Acciarini, C., Brunetta, F., & Boccardelli, P. (2021). Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: a systematic literature review. Management Decision. 59 (3). 638-652.
Arafat, M. Y., Khan, A. M., Saleem, I., Khan, N. A., & Khan, M. M. (2020). Intellectual and cognitive aspects of women entrepreneurs in India. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies. 11 (3). 278-297.
Baron, R. A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: a valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic “why” questions. Journal of business venturing. 19 (2). 221-239.
Bingham, C. B., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2014). Response to Vuori and Vuori's commentary on “Heuristics in the strategy context”. Strategic Management Journal. 35 (11).1698-1702.
Brockman BK, Becherer RC, Finch JH (2006) Influences on an entrepreneur is perceived risk: the role of magnitude, Likelihood, and risk propensity. Acad Entrepreneurship. 12 (2).103–121.
Buehler, R., & Griffin, D. (2015). The planning fallacy. In M. D. Mumford & M. Frese (Eds.), The psychology of planning in organizations: Research and applications. Routledge.
Burmeister, K., & Schade, C. (2007). Are entrepreneurs' decisions more biased? An experimental investigation of the susceptibility to status quo bias. Journal of business Venturing. 22 (3). 340-362.
Busenitz, L.W. (1999). Entrepreneurial risk and strategic decision-making: it is a matter of perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 35 (3). 325–340.
Butt, M., Jamil, N., & Nawaz, R. (2015). The mediating role of risk perception among cognitive biases towards decision to start a new venture. International letters of social and humanistic sciences. 54 (3). 88-95.
Cassar, G. (2010). Are individuals entering self‐employment overly optimistic? An empirical test of plans and projections on nascent entrepreneur expectations. Strategic Management Journal. 31 (8). 822-840.
Cervellati, E. M., Pattitoni, P., & Savioli, M. (2022). Do overconfident and over‐optimistic entrepreneurs invest too much in their companies? Theory and evidence from Italian SMEs. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. 16 (4). 769-800.
Chatterjee, S., Gupta, S.D. and Upadhyay, P. (2018), “Empowering women and stimulating development at bottom of pyramid through micro-entrepreneurship”. Management Decision. 56 (1). 160-174.
Cheng, L. J., & Liao, C. C. (2020). Connecting Social Capital, Cognitive Bias, and Entrepreneurial Intentions: About Gender Differences. Contemporary Management Research. 16 (1). 1-34.
Choi, Y. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ Decisions to Exploit Opportunities. Journal of Management. 30 (3). 377–395.
Companys, Y., & McMullen, J. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurs at work: The nature, discovery, and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Small Business Economics. 28 (4). 301–322.
Cossette, P. (2014). Heuristics and cognitive biases in entrepreneurs: a review of the research. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. 27 (5). 471-496.
Dali, N., & Harbi, S. (2016). The effect of risk perception and cognitive biases on the evaluation of opportunity in family and non-family entrepreneurs: the case of Tunisian entrepreneurs. Journal of Enterprising Culture. 24 (3). 281-312.
De Carolis, D. M., & Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship theory and practice. 30 (1). 41-56.
De Carolis, D. M., Litzky, B. E., & Eddleston, K. A. (2009). Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: The influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship theory and practice. 33 (2). 527-545.
De Kort, M. J., & Vermeulen, P. A. (2010). Entrepreneurial decision-makers and the use of biases and heuristics. Vermeulen, Patrick. AM and Curseu, PL (Ed.), Entrepreneurial Strategic Decision-Making A Cognitive Perspective, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Dölarslan, E. Ş., Kocak, A., & Özer, A. (2017). “Bats are blind?” Cognitive biases in risk perception of entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. 22 (03). 1-13.
Farsi, J. Y., Nouri, P., & Kafeshani, A. A. (2016). Identifying Decision Making Biases in Entrepreneurial Opportunity Exploitation Decisions. International Business Research. 9 (5). 158-163.
Forbes, D. P. (2005). Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others? Journal of business venturing. 20 (5). 623-640.
Forsyth, D. K., & Burt, C. D. (2008). Allocating time to future tasks: The effect of task segmentation on planning fallacy bias. Memory & cognition. 36 (4). 791-798.
Foss, K., & Foss, N. J. (2008). Understanding opportunity discovery and sustainable advantage: The role of transaction costs and property rights. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. 2 (3). 191–207.
Friedman, H. (2007). Does overconfidence affect entrepreneurial investment? Wharton Research Scholars Journal. 42 (2). 1- 33.
Gaglio, C.M., & Katz, J.A. (2007). The psychological basis of opportunity identifi cation: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics. 16 (2). 95-111.
González, M. F., Husted, B. W., & Aigner, D. J. (2017). Opportunity discovery and creation in social entrepreneurship: An exploratory study in Mexico. Journal of Business Research. 81 (2). 212-220.
Gudmundsson, S. V., & Lechner, C. (2013). Cognitive biases, organization, and entrepreneurial firm survival. European Management Journal. 31 (3). 278-294.
Gurbuz, I. B., & Ozkan, G. (2020). Integrated environmental impact and risk assessment in rural women entrepreneurs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27 (19). 23837-23848.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice. 19 (2). 139-152.
Haselton, M. G., Nettle, D., & Andrews, P. W. (2015). The evolution of cognitive bias. The handbook of evolutionary psychology. 724-746.
Hietschold, N., & Voegtlin, C. (2021).Blinded by a social cause? Differences in cognitive biases between social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 13 (3). 1-23.
Hmieleski, K. M., & Baron, R. A. (2009). Entrepreneurs' optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective. Academy of management Journal. 52 (3). 473-488.
Humbert, A. L., & Brindley, C. (2015). Challenging the concept of risk in relation to women’s entrepreneurship. Gender in Management: An International Journal. 30 (1). 2-25.
Irshad, S., Badshah, W., & Hakam, U. (2016). Effect of representativeness bias on investment decision making. Management and Administrative Sciences Review. 5 (1). 26-30.
Johnson, D. D., Blumstein, D. T., Fowler, J. H., & Haselton, M. G. (2013). The evolution of error: Error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases. Trends in ecology & evolution. 28 (8). 474-481.
Kannadhasan, M., Aramvalarthan, S., & Pavan Kumar, B. (2014). Relationship among cognitive biases, risk perceptions and individual’s decision to start a venture. Decision. 41 (1). 87-98.
Kappal, J. M., & Rastogi, S. (2020). Investment behaviour of women entrepreneurs. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.12 (4). 485-504.
Katz, J. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2003). Cognitive approaches to entrepreneurship research. In Cognitive, approaches to entrepreneurship research. 6 (2). 1-10.
Keh, H.T., Foo, M.D., & Lim, B.C. (2002). Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 27 (2). 125–148.
Koellinger, P., Minniti, M., & Schade, C. (2007). “I think I can, I think I can”: Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of economic psychology. 28 (4). 502-527.
Krueger, J., & Evans, M. (2004). If you do not want to be late, enumerate unpacking reduces the planning fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 40 (5). 586-598.
Kuckertz, A., Kollmann, T., Krell, P., & Stöckmann, C. (2017). Understanding, differentiating, and measuring opportunity recognition and opportunity exploitation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 23 (1). 78-97.
Landier, A., & Thesmar, D. (2008). Financial contracting with optimistic entrepreneurs. The Review of Financial Studies. 22 (1). 117-150.
Lee, Y. H., Dunbar, N. E., Miller, C. H., Lane, B. L., Jensen, M. L., Bessarabova, E., & Wilson, S. N. (2016). Training anchoring and representativeness bias mitigation through a digital game. Simulation & Gaming. 47 (6). 751-779.
Lucena, E. R. D. C., Silva, C. A. T., & Azevedo, Y. G. P. (2021). The Influence of Cognitive Ability on Cognitive Biases Generated by the Representativeness Heuristic. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios. 23 (01). 180-205.
Marshall, J. A., Trimmer, P. C., Houston, A. I., & McNamara, J. M. (2013). On evolutionary explanations of cognitive biases. Trends in ecology & evolution. 28 (8). 469-473.
McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. 2006. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review. 31 (1). 132-152.
Mitchell, R.K., Busenitz, L.W., Bird, B., Gaglio, C.M., McMullen, J.S., Morse, E.A., & Smith, J.B. (2007). The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 31 (1). 1–27.
Navis C, Ozbek OV (2016) the right people in the wrong places: the paradox of entrepreneurial entry and successful opportunity realization. Academy of Management Review. 41 (1). 109-129.
Neal, T., Lienert, P., Denne, E., & Singh, J. P. (2022). A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health. Law and human behavior. 46 (2). 99-120.
Neill, S., Metcalf, L. E., & York, J. L. (2017). Distinguishing entrepreneurial approaches to opportunity perception. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 23 (2). 296-316.
Omorede, A., Thorgren, S., & Wincent, J. (2015). Entrepreneurship psychology: a review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 11 (4). 743-768.
Poblete, C., Sena, V., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2019). How do motivational factors influence entrepreneurs’ perception of business opportunities in different stages of entrepreneurship? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 28 (2). 179-190.
Pryor, C., Webb, J. W., Ireland, R. D., & Ketchen, Jr, D. J. (2016). Toward an integration of the behavioral and cognitive influences on the entrepreneurship process. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. 10 (1). 21-42.
Randerson, K., Degeorge, J. M., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial opportunities: How do cognitive styles and logics of action fit in? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. 27 (1). 19-39.
Riasudeen, S., Ratnoo, H. S., Kannadhasan, M., & Singh, P. (2022). Risk Perception as a Mediator in Explaining the Relationship of Cognitive Biases and New Venture Creation. The Journal of Entrepreneurship. 31 (2). 274-297.
Robinson, A. T., & Marino, L. D. (2015). Overconfidence and risk perceptions: do they really matter for venture creation decisions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 11 (1). 149-168.
Shepherd, D.A., Williams, T.A., & Patzelt, H. (2015). Thinking about entrepreneurial decision-making: Review and research agenda. Journal of Management. 41 (1). 11–46.
Short, J. C., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Shook, C. L., & Ireland, R. D. (2010). The concept of “opportunity” in entrepreneurship research: accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of management. 36 (1). 40-65.
Simon, M. Houghton, S.M. & Aquino, K. 1999.Cognitive biases, risk perception, and new venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing. 14 (5). 113-134.
Singh, R. P. (2020). Overconfidence: A common psychological attribute of entrepreneurs, which leads to firm failure. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship. 23 (1). 25-39.
Sternberg, R. (2021). Entrepreneurship and geography—some thoughts about a complex relationship. The Annals of Regional Science. 69 (3). 559-584.
Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Decision-making and rationality in the modern world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Thomas, O. (2018). Two decades of cognitive bias research in entrepreneurship: what do we know and where do we go from here? Management Review Quarterly. 68 (2). 107-143.
Trevelyan, R. (2008). Optimism, overconfidence and entrepreneurial activity. Management Decision. 46 (7). 986-1001.
Wang, L., Liu, L., & Dai, Y. (2021). Owning your future: Entrepreneurship and the prospects of upward mobility in China. Economic Modelling. 104 (3). 1-13.
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly. 33 (1). 177-195.
Zahra, S. A., Korri, J. S., & Yu, J. (2005). Cognition and international entrepreneurship: implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation. International business review. 14 (2). 129-146.
Zan, T. T. (2020). The effect of decision-making heuristics and cognitive biases on MSMEs performance (Doctoral dissertation, MERAL Portal).
Zhang, S. X., & Cueto, J. (2017). The study of bias in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice. 41 (3). 419-454.
Zhang, W., Zhao, W., GAO, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2020). How do managerial ties influence the effectuation and causation of entrepreneurship in China? The role of entrepreneurs’ cognitive bias. Asia Pacific Business Review. 26 (5). 613-641. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 205 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 106 |
||