اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 477 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,073 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,296,950 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,348,246 |
تحلیلی بر ماهیت اساسنامه‌های مصوب دولت و کیفیت نظارت بر آن | ||
| پژوهشنامه حقوق اسلامی | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 25، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 63، فروردین 1403، صفحه 163-192 اصل مقاله (625.01 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30497/law.2024.245484.3459 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی صابری1؛ غلامرضا مولابیگی2؛ حسین محمدی احمدآبادی* 3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی، دانشکده معارف اسلامی و حقوق، دانشگاه امام صادق علیه‌السلام، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانش‌آموخته دکتری حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی، دانشکده معارف اسلامی و حقوق، دانشگاه امام صادق علیه‌السلام، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مطابق با اصل هشتاد و پنجم قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، سمت نمایندگی مجلس قائم به شخص است و مجلس نمی‌تواند زمام امر تقنین را به شخص یا هیأتی واگذار کند، ولی در موارد ضروری این اختیار را داراست که وضع قوانین را با رعایت اصل هفتاد و دوم به کمیسیون‌های داخلی خود تفویض کند؛ این قوانین در مدتی که مجلس تعیین می‌نماید به صورت آزمایشی اجراء شده و تصویب نهایی آن با مجلس خواهد بود. همچنین مجلس شورای اسلامی می‌تواند اختیار تصویب دائمی اساسنامه سازمان‌ها، شرکت‌ها و مؤسسات دولتی یا وابسته به دولت را به هیأت وزیران اعطا کند؛ با توجه به حیثیت تقنینی این اساسنامه‌ها و صلاحیت ذاتی مجلس در تصویب آن، همواره ماهیت اساسنامه‌هایی که به تصویب هیأت وزیران می‌رسد محل ابهام بوده است و نهادهای ناظر نیز در این زمینه رویکردهای متفاوتی اتخاذ کرده‌اند. بدین‌سان، نوشتار حاضر در صدد پاسخ به این پرسش است که «ماهیت اساسنامه‌های مصوّب دولت چیست و نحوه نظارت بر آن چگونه خواهد بود؟» این پژوهش با بهره‌گیری از روش توصیفی تحلیلی به این رهیافت رسیده است که اساسنامه‌های یادشده «مصوبه دولتی» تلقی می‌شوند و در نتیجه، علاوه بر نظارت شورای نگهبان و رئیس مجلس، مشمول نظارت دیوان عدالت اداری نیز قرار می‌گیرند؛ هر چند نظر به چالش‌ها و تزاحم‌های موجود در نظام حقوقی کشور، حدود نظارت مراجع مذکور بر این اساسنامه‌ها، نیازمند بازنگری و بازتبیین اساسی است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| تفویض قانون‌گذاری؛ هیأت وزیران؛ مصوبات دولتی؛ اساسنامه‌های دولتی؛ شورای نگهبان؛ دیوان عدالت اداری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| An Analysis of the Nature of Government-Approved Statutes and their Supervision | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Saberi1؛ Gholamreza Mowlabeigi2؛ Hosein Mohammadi Ahmadabadi3 | ||
| 1PhD Student in Public Law, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Law, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2PhD in Public Law, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3PhD Student in Public Law, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Law, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| ∴ Introduction The legal framework within which public and private entities operate is foundational to their legitimacy and functionality. This analysis delves into the specific realm of "Government-Approved Statutes" within the Islamic Republic of Iran, focusing on the legislative nature of these documents and the oversight mechanisms in place. The statutes in question are essential for the operation, duties, and authorities of legal persons and entities, both governmental and non-governmental. Their importance is underscored by the requirement for such statutes as a prerequisite for the registration and formal recognition of companies. This study is particularly concerned with statutes related to government and government-affiliated organizations, given their significant impact on the country's administrative system and citizens' rights. The legislative framework for these statutes was established under Article (85) of the Iranian Constitution in 1989, allowing for the delegation of statute approval to relevant commissions of parliament or directly to the government. This research aims to elucidate the nature of these statutes, the processes involved in their amendment or modification, and the authorities responsible for their oversight. ∴ Research Question The primary inquiries of this study revolve around three pivotal questions: - What is the nature of the statutes whose approval has been delegated by the Islamic Consultative Assembly to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran? - How are these statutes amended or modified? - Which authorities are tasked with overseeing these statutes? These questions aim to uncover the legislative and operational dynamics of government-approved statutes and the institutional checks and balances that govern them. ∴ Research Hypothesis This research operates under the hypothesis that the statutes approved by the Parliament and delegated to the government for oversight are essentially "governmental decrees." As such, they are posited to fall under the scrutiny of the Guardian Council, the Speaker of the Parliament, and the court of administrative justice, according to the principles laid out in the Constitution of Iran. This hypothesis suggests a structured mechanism of oversight and amendment, ensuring that these statutes align with constitutional mandates and effectively serve their intended purpose within the legal and administrative framework of the country. ∴ Methodology & Framework, if Applicable The methodology adopted for this research is descriptive-analytical, utilizing a comprehensive review of library sources alongside a detailed examination of legal practices in Iran. This approach involves an analysis of documentation from the Guardian Council, the court of administrative justice, the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Parliament), and the cabinet. The study also reviews the historical background and discussions surrounding the approval of article (85) of the constitution, aiming to provide a clear understanding of the legislative intent and the practical application of these statutes. This framework allows for a thorough exploration of the statutes' nature, the process of their amendment or modification, and the extent and quality of their oversight by designated authorities. By systematically addressing the research questions and hypothesis through this methodology, the study seeks to contribute novel insights into the legislative nature of government-approved statutes in Iran and the oversight mechanisms that ensure their alignment with constitutional and legal principles. The findings of this research are anticipated to have significant implications for the understanding of legal governance and administrative oversight in the context of Iranian law, with potential broader applications in comparative legal studies. ∴ Results & Discussion The investigation into the nature and oversight of "Government-Approved Statutes" within the Islamic Republic of Iran reveals several key findings, grounded in the constitutional provisions, particularly article (85). The distinction drawn by the constitutional review council between the legislative authority of the Parliament and the delegated approval powers for statutes of governmental organizations and companies underscores a nuanced approach to legislative delegation. This delegation is justified by practical needs for expedited approval processes, the complexity of statutes, the necessity for content coherence, and confidentiality concerns in certain cases. The analysis delineates the approval of statutes by the cabinet under article (85) as constituting "governmental decrees" rather than conventional laws or legal statutes. This classification has profound implications for the oversight mechanisms applicable to these decrees. The dual oversight by the Guardian Council for conformity with Sharia and the Constitution, and by the Speaker of the Parliament for alignment with ordinary laws, is complemented by the jurisdiction of the court of administrative justice. This court's practice underscores a layered oversight model, where it primarily addresses issues related to the execution of laws, jurisdictional overreach, and the protection of rights, without encroaching on the purviews reserved for the Guardian Council or the interpretation of Sharia and constitutional compliance. The study highlights a significant operational challenge within the oversight framework, particularly the potential for conflicting interpretations between the Speaker of the Parliament and the court of administrative justice rulings. Such conflicts can lead to ambiguity and confusion within the executive branch, underscoring the necessity for legislative refinement. The "Law on the Implementation of articles (85) and (138) of the Constitution of Iran" is identified as requiring amendments to introduce clear deadlines for the Speaker of the Parliament's opinions, aiming to mitigate the risks of operational discord among governmental agencies. ∴ Conclusion The findings of this research elucidate the intricate nature of "Government-Approved Statutes" in Iran and the sophisticated oversight framework designed to ensure their conformity with the broader legal and constitutional framework. The statutes approved by the Cabinet under Article (85) embody a distinct category of governmental decrees, necessitating a multifaceted oversight mechanism involving the Guardian Council, the Speaker of the Parliament, and the court of administrative justice. This oversight is pivotal in maintaining the decrees' alignment with Sharia, the Constitution, and ordinary laws, while also safeguarding individual and institutional rights against governmental overreach and misinterpretation of powers. However, the research identifies critical areas for improvement within this oversight structure, particularly the need for clearer procedural guidelines to resolve potential conflicts between oversight authorities. The recommendation for legislative amendments to specify a deadline for the Speaker of the Parliament's opinion is a constructive step towards enhancing the clarity and efficiency of the oversight process. Moreover, the study advocates for a comprehensive review and redefinition of the oversight scope by the involved authorities to address the evolving challenges within Iran's legal and administrative landscape. In sum, while the legal framework for "Government-Approved Statutes" in Iran is robust, navigating its complexities requires ongoing attention to detail, legislative refinement, and an adaptive approach to oversight. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the statutory approval and oversight processes, offering insights that are pertinent not only to legal scholars and practitioners but also to policymakers engaged in the refinement of Iran's legislative and administrative systems. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Legislative Delegation, Cabinet, Governmental Decrees, Governmental Statutes, Guardian Council, Court of Administrative Justice | ||
| مراجع | ||
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 105 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 76 |
||