اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 504 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,361 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,057,732 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,059,346 |
تبیین اولویت‌های تشویقی کارکنان: آیا تفاوتی بین بخش خصوصی و دولتی وجود دارد | ||
| اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی (اندیشه مدیریت) | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 12، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 24، مهر 1397، صفحه 216-234 اصل مقاله (696.03 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی-پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30497/smt.2018.2590 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رقیه ابدالی1؛ احمدعلی خائف الهی* 2؛ حسن دانایی‌فرد2؛ پرویز احمدی3 | ||
| 1دکتری مدیریت، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| 2استاد دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| 3دانشیار دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بر سر تفاوت‌های ذاتی و عَرضی سازمان‌های بخش دولتی و خصوصی بحث و جدل‌های فراوانی وجود دارد، زیرا مطالعات موجود همچنان به اجماعی کامل در باب شباهت‌ها و تفاوت‌های این دو بخش نائل نشده‌اند؛ از این رو مطالعات فعلی بر سه رویکرد کلی استوار است: 1-رویکرد سیاسی 2-رویکرد عمومی و 3-رویکرد حرفه‌ای. بر این اساس پژوهش حاضر درصدد آزمون تفاوت بین دو بخش دولتی و خصوصی بر اساس نوع اولویت‌های کارکنان به مشوق‌ها(مالی/غیرمالی، انگیزش درونی، محیط اجتماعی و حمایتی) است. داده‌های پژوهش با استفاده از پرسشنامه استاندارد گردآوری شد. بیش از 1300 پرسشنامه توزیع و در نهایت تعداد 1021 پرسشنامه (519 پرسشنامه از بخش خصوصی و 512 بخش دولتی) در تجزیه و تحلیل نهایی به کار گرفته شد. نتایج نشان داد دیدگاه کارکنان بخش دولتی و خصوصی در خصوص اولویت‌دهی به مشوق‌های مالی، انگیزش درونی و محیط کاری و اجتماعی حمایتی تفاوت معنادار ندارد. در زمینه تأثیر متغیرهای جمعیت‌شناختی بر متغیرهای وابسته، زنان و افراد با تجربه‌تر اولویت بیشتری به توسعه خود و محیط کاری و اجتماعی حمایتی در هر دو بخش قائل شدند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| انگیزش؛ توسعه؛ سازمان خصوصی؛ سازمان دولتی؛ مشوق | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Explaining The Incentive Preferences of Employees: Is There a Difference between Public and Private Sector | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Roghayeh Abdali1؛ Ahmad ali Khaef elahi2؛ Hasan Danayi fard2؛ Parviz Ahmadi3 | ||
| 1Phd. in Managment, Tarbiat Modares University | ||
| 2Full professor of Managment Faculy, Tarbiat Modares University | ||
| 3Associate professor of Managment Faculty, Tarbiat Modaress University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| There is a lot of controversy with regard to essential and accidental differences of public and private sector organizations, because the current studies have not yet achieved consensus on the similarities and differences between these two sectors. In this regard, the current studies are based on three main approaches: 1) political approach, 2) generic approach, 3) professional approach. Accordingly, this study is to explore incentive preferences of employees (including financial/non-financial incentives, intrinsic motivation, supportive and social atmosphere) in public and private sectors. Data were collected using a standard questionnaire. More than 1,300 questionnaires were distributed and in the end, 1021 questionnaires (519 questionnaires from private sector and 512 from public sector) were used in the final analysis. The results found no significant difference in the viewpoints of public and private sector employees about giving priority to financial incentives, self-development (intrinsic motivation) and supportive and social atmosphere. About the effect of demographic variables on dependent variables, the women and older people gave higher priority to self-development and supportive and social atmospheres. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| motivation, development, private organization, public organization, incentive | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
وارث، سیدحامد. (1380). نگرش فراپارادایمی به مدیریت دولتی. مجله دانش مدیریت، 55، 51–88. الوانی، سیدمهدی. (1384). تنگناهای مدیریت دولتی نوین. پیک نور، 11، 2–10. دنهارت، رابرت بی. (1937). نظریه های سازمان دولتی. ترجمه سیدمهدی الوانی و حسن دانایی فرد. تهران: انتشارات صفار، چاپ اول. Aryee, S. (1992). Public and Private Sector Professionals: A Comparative Study of Th eir Perceived Work Experience. Group and Organization Management, 17(1), pp.72 – 85.
Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2000). The subtlety of emotions. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press. B.
Borzaga, C., & Tortia, E. (2006). Worker motivations, job satisfaction and nonprofit social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), pp. 225–248.
Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and Private Management: What‘s the Difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), pp. 97 – 122.
Brewer, G. A. (2003). Building social capital: civic attitudes and behavior of public Servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), pp.5–26.
Brooks-Immel, D. R. (2014). A comparative study of public service motivation among organizational units in a public university. Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco. Retrieved from http://repository.usfca.edu/diss/106
Buelens, M., & Broeck, H. Van den. (2007). An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation between Public and Private Sector Organizations. Public Administration Review, 67 (1), pp.65–74.
Ratto, M & Burgess, S. (2003). The Role of Incentives in the Public Sector: Issues and Evidence. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(2), pp.285 - 300.
Cacioppe, R., & Mock, P. (1884). A Comparison of the Quality of Work Experience in Government and Private Organizations . Human Relations, 37(11), pp.923 – 940.
Camilleri, E. (2007). Antecedents affecting public service motivation. Personnel Review, 36(3), pp.356–377.
Conway, N., & Briner, R. (2002). Full-time versus part-time employees: Understanding the links between work status, the psychological contract, and attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(2), pp.279–301.
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M. (2002). A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(8), pp.927–946.
Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public Service Motivation: Building Empirical Evidence of Incidence and Effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), pp.499 – 518.
DeVos, A., Buyens, D., & Schalk, R. (2003). Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: Adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), pp.537–559.
Erdil, O., & Müceldili, B. (2014). The Effects of Envy on Job Engagement and Turnover Intention. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, pp.447–454.
Frank, S. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government Employees: Working Hard or Hardly Working? American Review of Public Administration, 34(1), pp.36–51.
Frank, S. U. E. A., & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government Employees: Working Hard or Hardly Working ? American Review of Public Administration, 34(1), pp.36–51.
Gabris, G. T., & Simo, G. (1995). Public Sector Motivation as an Independent Variable Affecting Career Decisions. Public Personnel Management, 24(1), pp.33–51.
Graham, C. B. J., & Hays, S. W. (1993). Managing the Public Organization (2nd ed.). Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
Houston, D. J. (2000). Public Service Motivation: A Multivariate Test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), pp.713 – 727.
Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2000). Generation X and the Public Employee. Public Personnel Management, 29(1), pp.55 – 76.
Jurkiewicz, C. L., Massey Jr, T. K., & Brown, R. G. . (1998). Motivation in Public and Private Organizations: A Comparative Study. Public Productivity and Management Review, 21(3), pp.230 – 250.
Kacmar, M. K., Carlson, D. S. ., & Brymer, R. A. . (1999). Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Commitment: A Comparison of Two Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(6), pp.976 – 94.
Karl, K. A., & Sutton, C. L. . (1998). Job Values in Today’s Workforce: A Comparison of Public and Private Sector Employees. Public Personnel Management, 27(4), pp.515 – 527.
Kemmerer, F. N. and Thiagarajan, S. (1989). What is an incentive system.pdf. Performance + Instruction, 28(3), pp.11–16.
Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the Private vs. Public Sector Managers. Public Personnel Management, 22(3), pp.391 – 401.
Kim, S., & Wright, B. E. (2004). I.T Employee Work Exhaustion: Toward an Integrated Model of Antecedents and Consequences. In the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. New Orleans.
Lefkowitz, J. (1994). Sex-Related Differences in Job Attitudes and Dispositional Variables: Now You See Them. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), pp.323–49.
Levy, D. A., & Nail, P. R. (1993). Contagion: a theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 119(2), pp.235–285.
Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government? Public Administration Review, 62(4), pp.395–404.
Lyons, S. T., Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and para-public sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66(4), pp.605–618.
Manzoor, A., & Treur, J. (2013). Modelling the role of emotion regulation and contagion in socially affected decision making. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, pp.73–82.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. . (1990). A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), pp.171 – 94.
Milkovich, G. T., & Boudreau, J. W. (2004). Personnel/human resource management : a diagnostic approach (5th ed). Plano, Tex. : Business Publications Inc.
Nawab, S., Ahamd, J., & Shafi, K. (2011). An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation between Public and Private Sector Organizations. Interdisciplinary Journal of Comtemporary Research in Business, 2(11), pp.110–128.
Nolan, G. O. (2014). An Economic Analysis of Public Versus Private Provision of Health Services in Ireland. University of Limerick.
Norris, M. E. (2004). Turnover in the military, Impact of workplace stressors. Saint Mary‘s University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Panagiotis, M., Alexandros, S., & George, P. (2014). Organizational Culture and Motivation in the Public Sector. The Case of the City of Zografou. Procedia Economics and Finance, 14(14), pp.415–424.
Parrott, W. G. (2001). The emotional experiences of envy and jealousy. In W. G. Parrott (Ed.), Emotions in social psychology: Essential readings (pp. 306–320). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press. P.
Parrott, W. G., & Smith, R. H. (1993). Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(6), pp.906–920.
Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity. Journal of Public Administration Research And Theory, 6(1), pp.5–22.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), pp.367–373.
Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1996). The values of business and federal government executives: More different than alike. Public Personnel Management, 25(3), pp.277–289.
Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward Preferences among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Service Ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16(4), pp.288–302.
Rainey, H. G. (1983). Public Agencies and Private Firms: Incentive Structures, Goals and Individual Roles. Administration and Society, 15(2), pp.207–242.
Rashid, S., & Rashid, U. (2012). Work Motivation Differences between Public and Private Sector. American International Journal of Social Science, 1(2), pp.24–33.
Rawls, J. R., Ulrich, R. A. ., & Nelson, O. T. . (1975). A Comparison of Managers Entering or Reentering the Profit and Nonprofit Sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 18(5), pp.616 –662.
Sheehy, G. (1995). New Passages: Mapping Your Life Across Time. New York: Random House.
Silver, M., & Sabini, J. (1978). The perception of envy. Social Psychology, 41(2), pp.105–111.
Staats, E. B. (1988). Public Service and the Public Interest. Public Administration Review, 48(2), pp.601–605.
Ulleberg, I. (2009). Incentive structures as a capacity development strategy in public service delivery. Paris, France: International Institute for Educational Planning.
Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), pp.545–556.
Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the People or Serving for Pay: Reward Preferences among Government, Hybrid Sector, and Business Managers. Public Productivity and Management Review, 14(4), pp.369 – 83.
Wright, B. E. (2001). Public-sector work motivation: A review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. Public Administration Review, 11(4), pp.559–586. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 482 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 528 |
||