اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 20 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 504 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,361 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,057,704 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,059,268 |
عوامل تخریبکنندة دوستی در محل کار با رویکرد مردمنگاری | ||
| اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی (اندیشه مدیریت) | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 12، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 24، مهر 1397، صفحه 264-289 اصل مقاله (822.83 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی-پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30497/smt.2018.2592 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نبی اله کهن1؛ علی صفری* 2؛ هادی تیموری2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت بازرگانی، گروه مدیریت، دانشکدة علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکدة علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف این پژوهش، شناسایی عوامل تخریبکنندة دوستی در محل کار است. نوع پژوهش، توسعه‌ای است و به منظور استخراج عوامل از روش کیفی به شیوة مردمنگاری استفاده شده است. جامعة آماری پژوهش، یک یگان نظامی بزرگ است که به دلایل امنیتی از ذکر نام آن خودداری میگردد. دادههای پژوهش توسط مصاحبه با 18 نفر از کارکنانی که دارای تجربة خدمتی بیش از 10 سال در سازمان مورد بررسی بوده و مایل به مصاحبه و گفتگو در این مورد بودند و مشاهدة تعاملات روزمرة کارکنان و نوشتن ویژگی این تعاملات توسط محقق که خود جزئی از جامعة مورد بررسی است، جمعآوری گردید. دادههای مصاحبه با توجه به حجم نمونه به اشباع نظری رسید. تحلیل دادههای گردآوری شده با رویکرد تحلیل تماتیک براون و کلارک (2006) انجام گرفت. پس از تحلیل اولیة دادهها، 3۶ کد اولیه به دست آمد که در سه عامل کلی فردی با 1۴ کد و دو زیرتم، سازمانی با ۱۹ کد و 6 زیرتم و برونسازمانی با 3 کد و یک زیرتم، دستهبندی گردید. سپس به توصیف ضخیم عوامل تخریبکنندة دوستی در محل کار پرداخته شده و سه متغیر عوامل فردی، سازمانی و برونسازمانی استخراج و ارائه گردید. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| دوستی در محل کار؛ تخریب دوستی؛ مردمنگاری؛ توصیف ضخیم | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| An Ethnography Approach to Workplace Friendship Deterioration Factors | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Nabi Allah Kohan1؛ Ali Safari2؛ Hadi Teimouri2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Candidate in Business Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Management, Faculty of administrative and Economic Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The purpose of this study is identifying factors affecting workplace friendship deterioration. The study type is developmental and in order to extract factors, ethnography methodology that is a qualitative method was used. The sample population is a military unit that for security issues, the name of that unit is not mentioned in this study. Data were selected via 18 military man interviews, having the tendency for dialogue and interview. Also the data selection was done observing the daily interaction of those employees for data collecting process and writing that interaction specification by the researcher being part of the sample. Data were saturated according to the sample size. The researcher is a member of under study population, therefore data collecting and observation was easy. Braun and Clarke (2006) thematic analysis was used for data analyzing. After initial analysis, 38 initial codes were generated. These codes were categorized to three general factors. These general factors were individual, organizational and extra-organizational factors. The individual factors have 14 codes and 2 sub-themes. The organizational factors have 19 codes and 3 sub-themes and the extra-organizational factors have 3 codes and 1 sub-theme. After thematic analysis, thick description was presented and the factors were extracted and presented. The factors have individual, organizational and extra-organizational variables. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Workplace friendship, Friendship deterioration, Ethnography, Thick description | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
منابع فارسی دانایی فرد، حسن و زینب مظفری (1387)، «ارتقاء روایی و پایایی در پژوهشهای کیفی مدیریتی: تأملی بر استراتژیهای ممیزی پژوهشی»، پژوهشهای مدیریت، سال اول، شمارة 1، 162-131. منابع لاتین Berman, E. M., West, J. P., & Richter, M. N. (2002), “Workplace relations: Friendships patterns and consequences (according to managers)”, Public Administrative Review, 62, 217–230.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, (3)2, 77-101.
Caforio, G. (2006), Handbook of the Sociology of the Military, New York: Springer.
Caforio, G. (2009), Advances in military sociology: essays in honor of charles C. Moskos, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Campbell, E., & Lassiter, L. E. (2015), Doing Ethnography Today: Theories, Methods, Exercises, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Chang, H.-T., Chou, Y.-J., Liou, J.-W. & Tu, Y.-T. (2016), “The effects of perfectionism on innovative behavior and job burnout: Team workplace friendship as a moderator”, Personality and Individual Differences, (96), 260–265.
Demir, M. (2015), Friendship and Happiness: Across the Life-Span and Cultures, Dordrecht: Springer.
Derlega, V. J., & Winstead, B. A. (1986), Friendship and Social Interaction, New York: Springer Verlag.
Dogan, K., & Vecchio, R. P. (2001), “Managing envy and jealousy in the workplace”, Workplace relations, (1), 57-64.
Engl, R. A. (2012), Forging Bonds: Examining Experiences of Friendship for Officers and Soldiers of the Continental Army, 1775-1783, Dissertation, Lehigh University.
Farrell, T., & Terriff, T. (2002), The sources of military change: Culture, Politics, Technology, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Fetterman, D. M. (2010), Ethnography: step-by-step, California: SAGE Publications.
Greif, G. L. (2009), Buddy system: understanding male friendships, New York: Oxford University Press.
Higate, P., & Cameron, A. (2006), “Reflexivity and Researching the Military”, Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 32, No 2, pp. 219-233.
Kaplan, D., & Rosenmann, A. (2014), “Toward an Empirical Model of Male Homosocial Relatedness: An Investigation of Friendship in Uniform and Beyond”, Psychology of Men and Masculinities, 15(1), 22-28.
Klepper, M. D., Sleebosb, E., Bunt, G. V., & Agneessens, F. (2010), “Similarity in friendship networks: Selection or influence? The effect of constraining contexts and non-visible individual attributes”, Social Networks, 32, 82–90.
Lin, C.-T. (2010), “Relationship between job position, job attributes, and workplace friendship: Taiwan and China”. Journal of Technology Management in China, Vol. 5, No. 1, 155–168.
Leavy, P. (2014), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, New York: Oxford University Press.
Mao, H. Y. (2006), “The relationship between organizational level and workplace friendship”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(10), 1819-1833.
Mao, H.-Y., Chen, C.-Y., & Hsieh, T.-H. (2009), “The relationship between bureaucracy and workplace friendship”, Social behavior and personality, 37(2), 255–266.
Mao, H.-Y., Hsieh, A.-T., & Chen, C.-Y. (2012), “The relationship between workplace friendship and perceived job significance”, Journal of Management & Organization, 18(2), 247–262.
Methot, J. R., Lepine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Christian, J. S. (2015), “Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 00, 1–45.
Morrison, R. L. (2009), “Are women tending and befriending in the workplace? Gender differences in the relationship between workplace friendships and organizational outcomes”, Sex Roles, 60, 1–13.
Morrison, R. L., & Cooper-Thomas, H. D. (2013), Relationships in Organizations: A Work Psychology Perspective, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Riordan, C. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (1995), “The Opportunity for Friendship in the Workplace: An Underexplored Construct”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 141– 154.
Sias, P. M., & Cahill, D. J. (1998), From coworkers to friends: the development of peer friendships in the workplace, Western journal of communication, 62(3), 273–299.
Sias, P. M., Heath, R. G., Perry, T., Silva, D., & Fix, B. (2004), “Narratives of workplace friendship deterioration”, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 21(3), 321–340.
Siebold, G. L. (2007), “The Essence of Military Group Cohesion”, Armed Forces & Society,Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 286-295.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998), Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tracy, S. J. (2013), Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Verweij, D. (2007), “Comrades or Friends? On Friendship in the Armed Forces”, Journal of Military Ethics, Vol. 6, No. 4, 280–291. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 473 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 453 |
||